Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 148: 81-92, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35462047

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) practice guideline developers often perform systematic reviews of potential economic evaluations to inform recommendation decision-making. We aimed to identify indirectness characteristics of economic evaluations, related to GRADE evidence-to-decision (EtD) theoretical frameworks, that influence selection of these articles. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and EconLit were systematically searched to May 2020 to identify indirectness characteristics relevant for economic evaluation transferability to GRADE EtD theoretical frameworks. Four reviewers screened citations to identify articles of any type that explored study characteristics most important or relevant to economic evaluation transferability, restricted to English language we generated frequencies of article features, used thematic analysis to summarize study characteristics, and assessed certainty in the evidence using GRADE-CERQual. RESULTS: We included 57 articles, with a dearth of empirical literature-some may have been missed. We identified eight general themes and 28 subthemes most important to transferability from 41% of articles. Moderate-to-high confidence evidence suggested that GRADE EtD domains of population, intervention and comparison research question elements, resource use estimation and methodology, and provider and decision maker acceptability are most important indirectness study characteristics that economists consider when choosing economic evaluation outcomes for use in recommendation decision-making. CONCLUSION: We have identified factors important for guideline developers to consider when selecting economic evaluations as research evidence. An economic competency on the development team facilitates these endeavors. This supports the GRADE Working Group's tenant of transparent reporting or availability of sufficient information elsewhere to assess indirectness.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Abordagem GRADE , Humanos , Análise Custo-Benefício
2.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 136: 203-215, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33984495

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about how developers and panel members report cost and cost effectiveness considerations in GRADE guideline Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) frameworks. A systematic survey was conducted to explore approaches and factors contributing to variability in economic information reporting. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Guideline organization websites were systematically searched to create a convenience sample of guidelines. Reviewers screened published EtD frameworks and generated frequencies of reporting approaches. We used thematic analysis to summarize factors related to variability of economic information reporting. RESULTS: We included 142 guidelines. The overall rate of reporting economic information was high (91%); however, there was variability across completion of predefined EtD Likert-type judgments (70%), noting information as not identified across EtD framework domains (57%), and providing remarks to justify recommendations (38%). Six themes contributing to variability emerged, related to: intervention, population, payor, provider, healthcare resource use, and economic model building factors. Only 2 guidelines performed a GRADE certainty appraisal of economic outcomes. CONCLUSION: Completing predefined EtD Likert-type judgments, specifically reporting a literature review approach, study selection criteria and economic model building limitations, as well as linking these to recommendation justification remarks are potential areas for improved use, adoption and adaptation of recommendation, and transparency of GRADE EtD frameworks.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Pesquisa Biomédica/normas , Projetos de Pesquisa Epidemiológica , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/economia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Pesquisa Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Abordagem GRADE/normas , Abordagem GRADE/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Projetos de Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
PLoS One ; 8(8): e71021, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23940683

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain has been estimated to affect 60% of patients with diabetes and is strongly associated with reduced activity tolerance. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that explored interventions to improve physical activity among patients with diabetes to establish whether co-morbid chronic pain was captured at baseline or explored as an effect modifier and if trials reported a component designed to target chronic pain. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We searched CINAHL, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus and PsycInfo from inception of each database to March 2012 for RCTs that enrolled patients with diabetes and randomly assigned them to an intervention designed to promote physical activity. Two reviewers independently selected trials and abstracted data. We identified 136 trials meeting our inclusion criteria, only one of which that reported capturing chronic pain measures at baseline. No trial reported on specific interventions to address chronic pain as a competing demand, or as an effect modifier. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Only 1 trial identified that aimed to promote physical activity among patients with diabetes reported that co-morbid chronic pain was captured at baseline. No trials reported exploring chronic pain as an effect modifier or targeting it as part of its intervention.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/patologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/patologia , Exercício Físico , Terapia por Exercício , Humanos , Atividade Motora , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
4.
J Can Chiropr Assoc ; 56(4): 243-6, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23204564
5.
J Can Chiropr Assoc ; 55(1): 20-2, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21403777
6.
J Can Chiropr Assoc ; 48(3): 211-6, 2004 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17549120

RESUMO

Four patients with clinical and electrodiagnostic evidence of carpal tunnel syndrome underwent intermittent axial wrist traction with a pneumatic device which applied a controlled traction force of forty to sixty pounds per square inch along the axis of the forearm. Traction cycled intermittently five seconds on and five seconds off. Treatment duration was five minutes. Patients in this study received between five and twelve treatment sessions over a three month period. All neurophysiological tests were performed at an independent site without knowledge of treatment plan before treatment commenced and then repeated after the last treatment three months later. Clinical tests were performed initially, after three months and after one year. Significant subjective improvement in all cases were accompanied by objective improvement and normalization of the nerve conduction studies.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA